Most, if not all, circumference reduction treatments involve the removal, damage, or destruction of fat cells. CellSound Body is a transformational, regenerative body contouring technology that uses neither thermal, cavitation, nor freezing modalities to reduce fat cells in its advanced technique.

Instead, CellSound delivers non-focused ultrasound, combined with our ElectroSonic Resonance, which penetrates to a maximum depth of 10 cm within the body. Maintained self-resonance of fat cells in the treatment area enables the release of stored lipid content in an exact imitation of how fat cells would naturally release following 30-45 minutes of aerobic activity. Within 2-3 minutes, fat cells treated with CellSound’s non-focused ultrasound have a maintained self-resonance leading to a significant energy demand that depletes the body’s consumed carbohydrates and glucose, subsequently changing the body’s metabolic fuel to fat.

In addition to fat cells, CellSound Body and Define also treats blood and lymph vessels much like CellSound Face to yield anti-aging rejuvenation outcomes (loose skin, cellulite, stretch marks, texture, creepiness, fine lines and wrinkles). CellSound Body and Define use slightly different range of non-focused ultrasound to not only cause self-resonance on blood and lymph vessels (much like CellSound Face) but also to stimulate self-resonance on fat cells.

This has been proven by the following two extensive studies, attached:

1. Study Report: The effect of a single treatment with the DU857 ultrasound and interferential unit on fat oxidation during exercise, by Prof. Naama Constantini. This clinical study, conducted by Prof. Na’ama Constantini of Hadassah Hospital, concluded that a single CellSound treatment successfully increased the percentage of fat used as an energy source by 52% compared to before the treatment. This was significantly larger, as compared to sham treatments, and supported the hypothesis that fat released by the treatment is consumed as metabolic fuel.
2. “A pilot study on the use of a low intensity, non-focused ultrasound device in abdominal circumference reduction” by Andrei I. Metelitsa, MD, FRCPC, Douglas C. Dover, MSc, Jeffrey S. Dover, MD, FRCPC The results of this study were that a notable reduction in measurements was documented, with an average abdominal circumference loss of up to 6.3 cm (95% CI 3.5-4.5), clinically apparent in patients’ photographs. An average 4-pound weight loss (95% CI 3.5-4.5) was also determined. Ultrasound measurements demonstrated an average 18.5% change in the thickness of the at layer (95% CI 3.0-34.0).